Legal Opinion

Farrell v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 9, 1924No. 2350PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaND, Judge

The appellant imported from Canada two lots of a substance known as “fish meal,” which is produced from the refuse parts of fish from fish canneries. The evidence shows that ■ the refuse is tanked and cooked, and then the oil is extracted and the residue is thoroughly dried and ground into a fine meal. In the busy canning season ofttimes the refuse is permitted to accumulate until it decomposes. The meal made from the decomposed material is suitable only for manure, if the decomposition is sufficient to make it unfit for animal food. If there has not been too much decomposition, the meal may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thurlow Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Wakem & McLaughlin (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API