Legal Opinion

Grace v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 1948No. 3709PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

The fundamental issue in this case is whether the Procter & Gamble Distributing Company was “doing business within this state” and therefore “liable in the same manner as domestic corporations” in trustee process. R. L., c. 280, s. 8. “The question is one of federal law.” See Campbell v. Corporation, 86 N. H. 310, 311, where this court regarded the federal decisions as controlling rather than convincing. Since the Campbell case, however, the legal fiction of corporate “presence” has been discarded as the test for determining jurisdiction over foreign corporations. While there are no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. West Publishing Co. v. McColganSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. W. H. Elliott & Sons Co. v. Nuodex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  3. Gill v. Fairchild Hiller Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1970
  4. Roy v. Transairco, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. W. H. Elliott & Sons Co. v. E. & F. King & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API