Legal Opinion
State v. Brand
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 2004No. C-030388PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} After a car accident, defendant-appellee Sharon D. Brand was cited for driving under the influence, 1 failure to stop after an accident, 2 and failure to control her vehicle. 3 Brand moved to suppress certain evidence, and the trial court granted part of her motion, suppressing the results of Brand’s blood test, the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus (“HGN”) test, and statements made by her to police prior to her arrest. The state now appeals, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. A One-Car Wreck on 1-75
{¶ 2} At Brand’s suppression hearing, two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MaylOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StaffordOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Columbus v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.