Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. De Hart

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFboessel, J.

The issue before us is whether the present action is barred by a judgment purporting to dismiss the complaint “ on the merits ” in a prior action, in which plaintiffs asserted the same causes of action.

On December 29,1953 the automobiles of defendant and plaintiff Myron Greenberg were involved in a collision on or near Route 80 about 17 miles from Syracuse. Plaintiff Sandra Green-berg was a passenger in her husband’s car. On April 7, 1954 De Hart commenced an action for property damage against Myron Greenberg in the Supreme Court, Cortland County. T. W. Coughlin, a Syracuse attorney, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mink v. KeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Honsinger v. . Union Carriage Gear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Harris v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Keim v. OrelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Aldrich v. Morningside Heights Housing Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gallo v. Teplitz Tri-State Recycling, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Stacey O. v. Donald P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Aguilar v. JacobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Lewin v. M. YedvarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Stray v. LutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API