Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs have appealed from an order dismissing their complaints. The motion to dismiss was made under subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the causes of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of actions thereon; also pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that there are existing final judgments of a court of competent jurisdiction rendered upon the merits determining the same causes of action between the same parties. The actions are in negligence, arising out of an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweeting v. Staten Island & Midland Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. De HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Wright v. L. C. Defelice & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Mintzer v. Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Bliss v. Omnibus Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Storch v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API