Legal Opinion

City of Highland Park v. Royal Oak No. 7 Storm Sewer Drain District

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1944No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 42,777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

The City of Highland Park filed a bill of complaint against Boyal Oak No. 7 storm sewer drain district (Oakland county), Oakland county, its drain commissioner, and its board of supervisors. Of the bonds issued by Boyal Oak No. 7 storm sewer drain district, plaintiff owns $65,000 face value and certain defendants who have joined the plaintiff in this appeal own an additional $85,000 face value. The bill of complaint recites the .history of the undertaking by means of which a sewer was built under the drain law. It sets forth the nature of the conduits that were built and the claim is made…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. People v. DrosteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. SalsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prawdzik v. Heidema Brothers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Corkins v. RitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brooks v. JanuaryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Marino v. McDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  5. Newberry v. Nine Mile-Halfway Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API