City of Highland Park v. Royal Oak No. 7 Storm Sewer Drain District
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.
The City of Highland Park filed a bill of complaint against Boyal Oak No. 7 storm sewer drain district (Oakland county), Oakland county, its drain commissioner, and its board of supervisors. Of the bonds issued by Boyal Oak No. 7 storm sewer drain district, plaintiff owns $65,000 face value and certain defendants who have joined the plaintiff in this appeal own an additional $85,000 face value. The bill of complaint recites the .history of the undertaking by means of which a sewer was built under the drain law. It sets forth the nature of the conduits that were built and the claim is made…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- People v. DrosteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. SalsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prawdzik v. Heidema Brothers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Corkins v. RitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Brooks v. JanuaryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Marino v. McDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- Newberry v. Nine Mile-Halfway Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.