Legal Opinion

Prawdzik v. Heidema Brothers, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1958No. Docket 57, Calendar 47,483PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The primary issue in this case involves the doctrine of res judicata. The parties before us were the litigants in a prior action in which judgment was entered for the plaintiff, who is the defend* ant in this action. Besistance arose when it was sought to enforce the judgment entered.

The prior action was entitled, “Heidema Brothers, Inc., v. John A. Prawdzik and Anna Prawdzik, his wife.” It was an action in ejectment. The plaintiff (sometimes hereafter referred to as Heidema) claimed title through 3 deeds: (a) quitclaim from the Prawdziks dated April 6, 1954; (b) quitclaim from the Prawdziks…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Chapin v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. City of Highland Park v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Clairview Park Improvement Co. of Grosse Pointe, Ltd. v. Detroit & Lake St. Clair RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Burnham v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Curry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Rogers v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Vogel v. Kalita (In Re Kalita)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API