Legal Opinion
Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 30, 2011No. C.A. 09-166-LPSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
Pending before the Court is a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 72) filed by Defendant Hartford Fire Insurance Company, as well as a Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (D.I. 74) and a Motion To Strike Certain Documents Relied Upon By Defendant Hartford Fire Insurance Company In Its Motion For Summary Judgment And Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 93) filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company fik/a Royal Indemnity Company. For the reasons discussed, Plaintiffs Motion To Strike will be granted in part and denied in part.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leon v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Yao-Yi v. Wilmington Trust Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Young v. Pleasant Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013