Legal Opinion
In Re Polaroid ERISA Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 2005No. 03 Civ.8335(WHP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
Defendant State Street Bank & Trust Company (“State Street”) moves to disqualify Plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel, Keller Rohrback L.L.P. (“Keller”) and Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, as well as their local counsel, the- Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, L.L.P. In the alternative, State Street seeks to have the Amended Consolidated Complaint stricken without prejudice. For the reasons set forth below, State Street’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hickman v. Burlington Bio-Medical Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- L.D. v. SeymourDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Sellick v. Town of GlenvilleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024