McClure v. Northland Insurance Companies
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
The question here is whether an injured driver’s recovery under his two automobile insurance policies is reduced because of workers’ compensation benefits he received for the same injury. On the basis of exclusions and limitations in the policies, the trial court answered the question in the affirmative. The court of appeals disagreed and so do we.
Plaintiff McClure suffered severe injuries in an automobile accident. He was driving his employer’s vehicle at the time and was acting in the course of his employment. The tortfeasor’s insurer paid McClure $100,000 and McClure also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American States Insurance Co. v. Estate of TollariSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Kluiter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- McClure v. Employers Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Tri-State Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. GooyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
3Cited by31 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Greenfield v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Miller v. Westfield Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Veach v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.