Legal Opinion

Kletzing v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal -from Marshall District Court. — Hon. Gr. W. Burn-ham, Judge. Action for malicious prosecution. Verdict for plain■fciff. From judgment on verdict defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

McClain J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for "three different prosecutions instituted by defendant ■against plaintiff in justice’s court for selling mortgaged ■chattels without the written consent of the mortgagee in violation of the provisions of Code, section 4852. With reference to the evidence it is sufficient to say that defendant as agent for another held chattel mortgages on domestic animals of plaintiff to secure the repayment of borrowed money; that in two or three different instances *506plaintiff sold different animals covered by these mortgages,, but as his evidence tends to show…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Potter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SavreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. State v. CarmeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. State v. StrigglesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. White v. International Textbook Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Hepker v. SchmickleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API