Legal Opinion
State v. Striggles
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided September 28, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlbeRT, J.
We gather from the í’ecord and arguments of counsel the following history of the ease at bar: It appears that in the early part of 1923 there was installed in several places of business in the city of Des Moines a gum- or mint-vending machine. The,machine and its workings are fully set out in the opinion in the case of State v. Ellis, 2Ó0 Iowa 1228. In that opinion it was judicially determined that such machine was a gambling device, within the inhibition of the statute.
On August 1, 1923, in several proceedings then pending in the municipal court of the city of Des Moines, a decision was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Delamater v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- McCollum v. McConaughySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Kletzing v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- State v. HanaphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- McNeely v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. v. F. W. Post No. 3722Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- State v. WharffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.