Legal Opinion
Nascimento v. Connecticut Life & Casualty Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 17, 2008No. AC 28856PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The plaintiff, Rui M. Nascimento, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, finding him 25 percent comparatively negligent for damages sustained in an automobile accident. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the court’s findings of fact were contrary to the evidence presented at trial, (2) the court improperly concluded that he violated General Statutes § 14-283 (e) and (3) the evidence presented at trial did not support the court’s finding of comparative negligence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Reiner, Reiner & Bendett, P.C. v. Cadle Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fasanelli v. TerzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. CordovaConnecticut Superior Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MYRTLE MEWS ASS'N, INC. v. BordesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Nascimento v. CONNECTICUT LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008