Barton v. Delfgauw
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 NATHEN BARTON, CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05610-JRC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS 12 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 JOE DELFGAUW, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ consent and on their cross-motions for 17 summary judgment. See Dkts. 247, 249, 251, 253. The Court denies the request for oral 18 argument, which is not necessary to resolve the issues presented in the motions. 19 Plaintiff is a pro se litigant who has brought over a dozen actions in this district, and 20…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.