Legal Opinion
Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2009No. 08-15693PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed April 28, 2009, slip op. 4919, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 4944, lines 2-6:
<It follows that, while classification may be a strong indication of secrecy as a practical matter, courts must undertake an independent evaluation of any evidence sought to be excluded to determine whether its contents are secret within the meaning of the privileges is replaced with
<It follows that, while classification may be a strong indication of secrecy as a practical matter, courts must independently evaluate each claim of privilege to determine whether it implicates “secrets”…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Binyam Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Laguerre v. Nevada System of Higher EducationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Carr v. International Game TechnologyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.