Legal Opinion

Michigan National Bank v. Michigan Livestock Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1989No. 81932, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

In this action for conversion, defendant claims that as a matter of law it is shielded from liability by UCC 7-4041 or, in the alternative, by UCC 9-3072 when read in conjunction with 1 Restatement Torts, 2d, § 233(1). The Court of Appeals entered summary judgment in defendant’s favor on the basis of UCC 7-404.

We hold that §7-404 does not apply to the defendant, and we reject the latter defense as it is based upon a misapplication of the Restatement provision. We therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

*280I

In 1978 and 1981, plaintiff, Michigan National Bank, made loans to farmers…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trail Clinic, Pc v. BlochMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
  3. Frizzell v. Rundle & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kearney v. CluttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Willis v. Ed Hudson Towing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Ensminger v. BurtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Bank of New York v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. The Bank of New York v. Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Oil Company, Counter-Claimant v. The Bank of New York, Counter-Defendant. Amoco Oil Company, Third-Party v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Trading Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Jones v. BallardMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API