Legal Opinion

Frizzell v. Rundle & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

EROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Dayidson County. W. K. McAlister, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLuktoN, J.

One Anglin executed to Frizzell, the plaintiff, a mortgage upon bis household furniture to secure the latter as the surety of the mortgageor upon certain rent notes. The property mortgaged was in the residence of the mortgageor, and was to remain in his custody and possession until the maturity of the notes. It was stipulated that should the mortgageor remove or attempt to remove the property, or attempt to sell same, that then the mortgagee should have the right to take possession, and that, in such event, or in case default was made in payment of the secured debt, that Frizzell should sell…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mammoth Cave Production Credit Ass'n v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  2. United States v. Henry W. Matthews and Nettie Matthews, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Yuba Livestock Auction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Smith v. CrossTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kearney v. CluttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. J. T. Fargason Co. v. BallTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API