Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Clutton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to "Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Trover. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of trover for the conversion of certain household and personal goods. Plaintiff and her husband, on April 24, 1890, executed a chattel mortgage to one Cromwell Clutton, to secure the payment of an expressed consideration of $135. Shortly afterwards Mr. Kearney died. After his death, Mrs. Kearney executed to another person a second mortgage upon the goods, for the sum of $200. She broke up housekeeping, and stored the goods with the defendants Grace, who carried on a storage and cartage business, under the name of the Fidelity Storage Company. Cromwell Clutton, it appears,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spooner v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Hoffman v. CarowCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Koch v. Branch & CrookesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Frizzell v. Rundle & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Calkins v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WheelockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Charles Magley III v. M&W IncorporatedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Lovejoy v. Merchants' State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Willis v. Ed Hudson Towing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. First National Bank v. SimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API