Colorado State Board of Examiners of Architects v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton
In the trial court defendant in error was plaintiff and will be referred to as petitioner; plaintiffs in error were defendants and will be referred to as the Board.
Petitioner applied to the Board for a license to practice architecture pursuant to C.R.S. ’53, 2-10-14 (1), which provides that at any time within six months after the act becomes effective, upon application:
“The Board shall issue a license without written or oral examination to: (1) Any person who has been engaged in the practice of architecture in Colorado, as defined in Section (1) of Section 10-2-2, for a period of three years…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Degge v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- North Poudre Irrigation Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Bennett v. OttoNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Kopff v. JuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rueckhaus v. SnowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- In Re the Marriage of PlankColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- COLORADO STATE BOARD OF EXAM. OF ARCH. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957