Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Otto

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1903No. 12,874PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to the district court for York county: Samuel H. Sornborger, Distriot Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

May 13, 1901, William Otto filed a petition with the clerk of the village of Waco, asking that a license be granted him for the sale of intoxicating liquors in said village for the ensuing year. A remonstrance was filed, *653upon which, a hearing was had, and the village trustees awarded the applicant a license for the sale of liquors for one year from May, 1901. From the order allowing the license, an appeal was taken to the district court and upon a hearing the order of the board was affirmed. From this order a writ of error has been taken to this court. -

The defendants in error first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. MyrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bohanan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. O'Donohue v. HendrixNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Newlove v. WoodwardNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. McEwen v. Nebraska State College Sys.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Powell v. MorrillNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dye v. RaserNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API