Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center Associates
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 1990No. 8085; 8106PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
These consolidated appeals arise out of an action for partition by sale that was the subject of a prior decision by our Supreme Court. Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center Associates, 208 Conn. 318, 544 A.2d 1207 (1988). In its decision, the court remanded the matter to the trial court to set a new judicial sale date. Id., 329.
On remand, the trial court set a new date and the committee published legal notice of the sale. The notice provided in part that the successful bidder would be required to make a $100,000 deposit and to sign a contract providing for forfeiture of the deposit if the balance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mariners Savings Bank v. DucaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Jefferson v. KarpowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Land Enterprises, Inc. v. DormanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fruin v. Colonnade One At Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- First National Bank of Chicago v. MaynardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. RiosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Arrowhead by the Lake v. Arrowhead, No. Cv95-0128458 (Dec. 31, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Chelsea Groton Bank v. Gates Realty Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.