Legal Opinion

United Technologies Corp. v. Groppo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 24, 1991No. 14248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

During the years 1976 through 1982, the plaintiff, United Technologies Corporation (UTC), was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware. During those years, UTC did business in Connecticut and, consequently, was subject to the Connecticut corporation business tax embodied in chapter 208 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958, as amended (corporation business tax).1 The *667defendant was the commissioner of the department of revenue services for the state of Connecticut (commissioner) at the time of the institution of this action and the action was brought…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. Fadner v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API