Casey v. Murphy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a second trial of this action, following the decision of this court on the first appeal, which is reported in 143 Wash. 17, 253 Pac. 1078.
Many of the question raised by the appellant are foreclosed by the prior decision, which, although it contains this statement, “The only question for determination is whether the action was prematurely brought, ’ ’ has the effect of determining all other questions which properly might have been raised on that appeal; the rule being, as stated in Morehouse v. Everett, 141 Wash. 399, 252 Pac. 157, that questions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Rounds v. AleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Anderson v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Jones v. FordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Casey v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Sisters of St. FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 1940