Casey v. Murphy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover a commission upon the sale of certain timber land. The cause came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendants moved for a dismissal on the ground that the action had been prematurely brought. This motion was sustained. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, and the motion was granted as against the defendant Joseph Murphy and denied as to the defendant Stuart D. Barker. From the order granting a new trial, Murphy appeals.
The only question for determination is.whether the action was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hunter v. Wenatchee Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- McFerran v. HerouxWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Regional Enterprises, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Highlands Plaza, Inc. v. Viking Investment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Fanning v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Hemisphere Loggers & Contractors, Inc. v. Everett Plywood Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.