Legal Opinion

Melendez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 11, 1995No. 01-94-00652-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

We deny the State’s motion to abate this appeal, and reverse and remand for a new trial pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 50(e). A jury convicted the appellant, Elíseo Melendez, of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by an earlier felony, at 25-years confinement. On appeal, the State discovered that a crucial exhibit had been lost and attempted to substitute the affidavits of the trial attorneys for the exhibit. The appellant opposed the substitution.

Fact Summary

Acting on an anonymous tip, Houston Police Officer F.A.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  3. Culton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Adams v. Transportation Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Melendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Melendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API