Legal Opinion

Melendez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1996No. 808-95Published

1Opinion of the Court

936 S.W.2d 287 (1996)

Eliseo MELENDEZ, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 808-95.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

December 18, 1996.

Floyd W. Freed, III, Houston, for appellant.

Dan McCrory, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

This cause involves, among other prosy inquiries, where in a complete appellate record would one reasonably familiar with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure ("TRAP") expect to find admitted exhibits (other than physical evidence):…

Also in this document: Dissent · McCORMICK; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Keller.

3Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Timmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API