Melendez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
This cause involves, among other prosy inquiries, where in a complete appellate record would one reasonably familiar with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure (“TRAP”) expect to find admitted exhibits (other than physical evidence): transcript or statement of facts? TRAP 50(a). More to the point, we granted the State’s sole ground for review in terms of whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that appellant is entitled to a new trial under TRAP 50(e).1
A host of adverse decisions rejecting attempted appeals makes painfully evident that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Timmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Austell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Osuch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Walter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Boone, Douglas A., Denyse Ann Boone, and Anthony Troy Boone v. Fisher, George, M. D., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.