Legal Opinion

Melendez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1996No. 808-95PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

This cause involves, among other prosy inquiries, where in a complete appellate record would one reasonably familiar with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure (“TRAP”) expect to find admitted exhibits (other than physical evidence): transcript or statement of facts? TRAP 50(a). More to the point, we granted the State’s sole ground for review in terms of whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that appellant is entitled to a new trial under TRAP 50(e).1

A host of adverse decisions rejecting attempted appeals makes painfully evident that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Timmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Austell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Osuch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  3. Walter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Boone, Douglas A., Denyse Ann Boone, and Anthony Troy Boone v. Fisher, George, M. D., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API