Legal Opinion
Jimmie Leon Pollard v. George Galaza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 2002No. 00-16210PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KING, District Judge.
We must decide whether the state court correctly allowed the government to use a statement, obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), at trial for impeachment purposes.
I
This case arises out of habeas petitioner Jimmie Leon Pollard’s conviction in a California state court for second-degree murder and trespassing. After Pollard was arrested and taken into custody, he was held in the police station interview room. About three hours after his arrest, Pollard was sleeping when Detective Bob Stratton of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Joseph Sandgathe v. Manfred F. MaassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Charley B. HaswoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Amos Dwayne Stevenson v. Gail Lewis, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.