Legal Opinion

in Re F.N. Williams, Sr., and Jared Woodfill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2015No. 15-0581PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves yet another mandamus proceeding concerning the City of Houston’s equal rights ordinance, the referendum petition calling for its repeal, and the City Council’s duties in response. See In re Woodfill, 470 S.W.3d 473, 481, 2015 WL 4498229, at *7 (Tex.2015) (per curiam) (directing the City Council to comply with its ministerial duties and either repeal the ordinance or submit it to popular vote). Though the ordinance is controversial, the law governing the City Council’s duties is clear. Our decision rests not on our views on the ordinance — a political issue the citizens of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Blum v. LanierTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re WoodfillTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Allen Mark Dacus, Elizabeth C. Perez, and Rev. Robert Jefferson v. Annise D. Parker and City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, and City of Houston v. David B. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  2. In RE DALLAS HERO AND CATHY CORTINA ARVIZU v. the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2024
  3. In RE DAVID ROGERS, JENNIFER PAKENHAM, AND KRISTI POWELL v. the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2024
  4. In RE THE HONORABLE DERRECK ROSE, WILMA GREEN, AND DIANE MERCHANT; 14th Court of Appeals DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2026
  5. In Re Manuel O. Moreno v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API