Legal Opinion

Blum v. Lanier

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1999No. 98-0256PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

In an election to amend a city charter, the plaintiff attempted to enjoin the city from using allegedly misleading language on the ballot to describe the proposed amendment. While we do not address the merits of plaintiffs claim at this time, we must resolve two jurisdictional questions: (1) whether a district court has jurisdiction to enjoin a city from using allegedly vague and misleading language on the ballot describing the proposed amendment to the city charter initiated by petition, and (2) whether a qualified voter who signs the petition that initiates the election has standing to seek…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brown v. ToddTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Dallas v. AlbertTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re GambleTexas Supreme Court · 2002

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API