In RE DALLAS HERO AND CATHY CORTINA ARVIZU v. the State of Texas
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0678 ══════════ In re Dallas HERO and Cathy Cortina Arvizu, Relators ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ═══════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BUSBY delivered the opinion of the Court. This dispute sits at the intersection of citizens’ power to propose amendments to their city’s charter, the city council’s power to do likewise, and the council’s responsibilities in preparing the ballot for an election to approve proposed amendments. See TEX. ELEC. CODE § 52.072; TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 9.004(a). Relators…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Blum v. LanierTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Glass v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re AutoNation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- Taxpayers' Association v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.