Legal Opinion
(HC) Otto v. Tampkins
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 4, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00425Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUSSELL W. OTTO, No. 2:19-cv-00425 MCE GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Introduction and Summary 19 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss 21 claiming petitioner has failed to exhaust his state court remedies for several of his claims. ECF 22 No. 10. Petitioner has filed an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- King v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.