Legal Opinion

Beals v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1923No. 2798. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The _ appellant, George Beals, has appealed from and has assigned error to that part of the judgment rendered in favor of W. E. Edwards on his cross-plea reading:

“Against George Beals and John W. Hicks, jointly and severally, for whatever amount he (W. E. Edwards) is compelled to pay on this judgment.”

“This judgment” refers to the judgment which the Southern Furniture Company was allowed against W. E. Edwards for the amount of the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees of the $1,025 note, with a foreclosure of the vendor’s lien on the land. The point made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Spann v. Cochran & EwingTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hoeldtke v. HorstmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Hill v. HoeldtkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. BealsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Key v. Alamo Nat. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. McGinty v. DennehyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API