Hoeldtke v. Horstman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from the District Court of Fannin County. Tfied below before Hon. Ben. H. Denton.
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Associate Justice.
— This is the second appeal in this litigation; the former is reported in 117 S. W., 217. The suit was originally instituted by Hoeldtke, one of the plaintiffs in error, against B. S. McCleary and L. C. Hill, seeking a recovery on a promissory note and the foreclosure of a vendor’s lien against a tract of 57 acres of land, for which the note was a part of the purchase price. Leach, the other plaintiff in error, was made a party defendant upon the ground that he held a note for $175 which was also a lien against the same tract of land. In the course of this opinion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- White v. . RintoulNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Spann v. Cochran & EwingTexas Supreme Court · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allen v. TraylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Breaux v. BankerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Hubard & Appleby, Inc. v. ThackerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Barber v. Federal Land Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Crow v. WillardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.