Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hoeldtke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Fannin County. Tried below before Hon. Ben H. Denton.

1Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Associate Justice.

—Defendant in error Hoeldtke sued Horstman, McLeary, Leach and plaintiff in error upon a note and to foreclose a vendor’s lien on land. The petition claimed that defendant McLeary had bought the land in question from defendant Horstman, and as a part of the consideration assumed the payment of the note sued on by plaintiff and held by plaintiff against the land, and then sold the land to the plaintiff in error, Hill', who, as a part of the consideration, assumed the payment of the note held by plaintiff. The same facts were alleged as to the note held by Leach in suit.

T…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dunning v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Ellis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Loeb v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Malanaphy v. Fuller & Johnson Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Breaux v. BankerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Casey v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Dickson v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Beals v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API