Legal Opinion
William R. Pitzak v. Office of Personnel Management
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1983No. 82-1592PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner William R. Pitzak seeks review of the final order of the Merit Systems Protection Board affirming the Office of Personnel Management’s determination that the petitioner was not eligible for disability retirement under 5 U.S.C. § 8337(a). The petitioner applied for disability retirement on November 6, 1979,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William E. Scarborough v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Zubrod v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Wayne Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Amrep Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.