State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
The evidence concerning the crime charged and the defendant’s responsibility for it as gathered by the officers and related to the magistrate, was amply sufficient to justify the warrant of arrest and to support the finding of probable cause at the preliminary hearing. State v. Dickens, 278 N.C. 537, 180 S.E. 2d 844; Spinelli v. U.S., 393 U.S. 410, 21 L.Ed. 2d 637. The defendant’s objections to the issuance of the warrant and to the finding of probable cause are not sustained.
During the jury selection, the defendant made objection to the court’s failure to sustain his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.