Legal Opinion

State v. Bissantz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1947PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

We have before us two questions. The first question posed is whether a public official convicted of bribery in office under R.C. 2921.02(B) may obtain expungement of his record. The second question is whether an order of expungement may restore the privilege to hold public office to an individual convicted of bribery in office. We answer the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative.

I

We conclude that both the trial court and the court of appeals correctly held that a conviction of bribery in office may be expunged. The applicable statutory framework with respect to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. Corrigan v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re Application of DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. Friendly DrugsOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gains v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Morrison v. Board of Trustees of Green Tp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API