Legal Opinion

Russell v. Stephens

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1937No. 26360. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate. The principal defendant, Pasha C. Stephens, in her answer, denied the claimed right to rescind, and affirmatively pleaded a counterclaim for breach of the contract. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to the relief sought. From the judgment entered rescinding the contract, Mrs. Stephens appeals.

February 20, 1935, the appellant, through one E. J. Hilton, acting for her, sold to the respondent a farm consisting of one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Rose v. RundallWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stevens v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russell v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API