Legal Opinion
Branscumb v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 16, 2004No. 04-147PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
The issue on appeal is .whether a cause of action for negligence arises against the owner of an uninsured motor vehicle based solely upon a violation of the Arkansas Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, Ark. Code Ann. § 27-19-101, et seq. (2004), and the Arkansas Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance Act, Ark. Code Ann. § 27-22-101, et seq. (2004). Because this is a matter of first impression, we have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 1—2(b)(1) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court.
Appellee Clinton Freeman allowed Jonathan D. Bell to test drive his uninsured…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carr v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Shannon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Brown v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Grine v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Yanmar Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Lloyd v. Pier West Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- DePriest v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.