Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Domergue
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 1969No. Civ. 25549PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN,
J.—Gregory A. Harrison and some others of the several cotenants in a 3,200-acre property known as the Stetson Ranch appeal from a judgment denying partition. The court determined that an agreement entered into in 1952-between the predecessors of all the present owners should be given effect as a perpetual waiver, enforceable by successors of the original parties, of the cotenants’ statutory right of partition. We have concluded that the agreement should not be so construed; we therefore reverse the judgment.
In March 1952 the ranch was owned in undivided interests by three couples:…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Smith v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Asels v. AselsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Martin v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- American Medical International, Inc. v. FellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- LEG INVESTMENTS v. BoxlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Braaten v. BraatenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.