Legal Opinion
Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2008No. 04-74825PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Per curiam
Daniel Sandoval-Luna petitions for review of his removal proceedings. He contends that the Immigration Judge’s denial of a continuance constitutes an abuse of discretion and violation of due process, and that the qualifying relative requirement for cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D), violates his equal protection rights. The government asserts we have no jurisdiction over Sandoval-Luna’s petition. We hold that we have jurisdiction, and we deny the petition for review.
BACKGROUND
The former Immigration and Naturalization Service charged Daniel Sandoval-Luna with removability…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Mario Antonio Portillo Baires v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Leonardo CAMPOS-SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Nestor Rodrigo Rios-Berrios v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Vargas-Hernandez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Ahmed v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Singh v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Diaz-Covarrubias v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- RAJAHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- Cruz Rendon v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.