Legal Opinion
Keith v. Hughey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 15, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Injunction. Before Judge Fite. Whitfield superior court. April 3,1912.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.
1. Under the ruling in Anderson v. Newton, 123 Ga. 512 (51 S. E. 508), and Kirkland v. Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Company, 126 Ga. 246 (55 S. E. 23), the assignment of error in the exception to the interlocutory order of the court, which in effect stopped the regular proceeding of a claim case, was sufficient.
2. Considering section 5527 of the Civil Code (which declares that all petitions for equitable relief shall be filed in the county of the residence of one of the defendants against whom substantial relief is prayed, “except in cases of injunctions to stay pending proceedings, when the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ray v. Home & Foreign Investment & Agency Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Railroad Commission v. Palmer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Anderson v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Thomason v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Kirkland v. Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Home Mixture Guano Co. v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Kinney v. CrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Grace v. Interstate Bond Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Bailey v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.