Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village Council

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 95-58Published

1DissentMoyer, C.J.

I respectfully dissent from the judgment affirming the denial of the writ of mandamus. The majority initially relies on the Home Rule Amendment to hold that a municipal charter provision controls over a conflicting provision of the Ohio Constitution. However, because the provisions of a home-rule charter derive their authority from the Ohio Constitution, where charter provisions are contrary to constitutional provisions, the Constitution prevails. State ex rel. Semik v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 334, 336, 617 N.E.2d 1120, 1122, citing State ex rel. Hinchliffe v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson's Markets, Inc. v. New Carlisle Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United Telephone Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Morris v. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bazell v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API