Legal Opinion
Foster v. Adams and Associates, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 11, 2019No. 3:18-cv-02723Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CAROL FOSTER, et al., Case No.18-cv-02723-JSC 9 Plaintiffs, AMENDED ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ 10 v. MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 11 ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 79 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Carol Foster and Theo Foreman bring a class action suit under the Employee 14 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”),
29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., on behalf of 15 participants and beneficiaries of the Adams and Associates Employee Stock Ownership Plan 16 (“ESOP”). Plaintiffs allege that Adams and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.