Coneff v. AT & T CORP.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are current and former customers of Defendants, New Cingular Wire less Services, Inc., and AT & T Mobility, LLC (collectively, “AT & T”). Plaintiffs filed a class action against AT & T, which responded by seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement contained in its contracts with Plaintiffs. The district court refused to enforce the arbitration agreement on state-law unconscionability grounds, relying primarily on the agreement’s class-action waiver provision. AT & T appeals. We reverse the district court’s substantive unconscionability ruling and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Amrish Rajagopalan v. Noteworld, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Adams v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Lilly v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Truly Nolen of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.