Legal Opinion

Mandeville v. Pooler

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 29, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCondon, J.

This is an action of assumpsit which was tried before a justice of the superior court sitting with a jury and resulted in a directed verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $99.08, plus interest. The plaintiff’s motion for a directed .verdict in the sum of $4030.58, with interest, was denied by the trial justice and to this ruling the plaintiff excepted.

The case is now before us on the plaintiff’s bill of exceptions setting out this exception and others taken during the trial. However, the plaintiff is now relying solely on its exception to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Provost v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Capron v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jonklaas v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Scally v. JosselsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API