Legal Opinion

Provost v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1926No. 258PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The appellants are co-partners engaged in business as stock brokers with membership in the New York Stock Exchange. They brought suit in the Court of Claims to recover, as an illegally exacted tax, the cost of internal revenue stamps affixed by them in the period from 1917 to 1920 to “tickets” which were documentary evidence of transactions commonly known in the stock-brokerage business as the “ loan ” of shares of stock and the return by the borrower to the lender of shares of stock “ borrowed.” The case was tried upon agreed facts embodied in the findings of the court below, and from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Marriott International Resorts, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Kornman & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API