Legal Opinion

Kenyon v. Williams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by Williams against the appellants, upon a promissory note. Judgment for the plaintiff.

*45The complaint alleges, that, on the 23d day of June, 1860, the defendants were co-partners, trading and doing business under the firm name and style of the “Farmers’ Union Store,” at Elkhart, on which day the defendants, by their agent, Solomon N. Chappel, (who was one of the firm,) made and delivered to the plaintifl' the following promissory note, which is unpaid, viz.:

“$250. Elkhart, June 23ci, 1860.
“Due Michael Williams, or order, two hundred and fifty dollars, value received, with…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark's Executors v. Van RiemsdykSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ButterworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Manning v. GasharieIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Hays v. CrutcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Laycock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API