Legal Opinion

State v. Malkin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1986No. S-393PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case requires us to determine the extent to which the validity of statements in an affidavit supporting a search warrant may be challenged. While other jurisdictions have decided this question,1 we are presented with a question of first impression for Alaska.2

The court of appeals concluded that where an affidavit contains material misstatements, such that there would not be probable cause to issue a search warrant after the misstatements were excised, the warrant and evidence seized pursuant thereto must be suppressed unless the state…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. State v. BucciniArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bostic v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API